The NBA has told sportsbook partners to remove several markets, including same-player under parlays. The decision reflects how betting design can create integrity and player-safety concerns.
The NBA has told sportsbook partners to remove several markets, including same-player under parlays. The decision reflects how betting design can create integrity and player-safety concerns.
The NBA has asked its sportsbook partners to take several bets off the menu this season, including a same-player parlay built around unders on that player’s statistics. The league’s memo, distributed to betting partners on Friday, was reported by ESPN on October 16 and revisited in coverage over the weekend.
The move is narrow, but it gets at a wider issue: a market can be legal and still create a particular integrity risk when a small in-game event has an outsized effect on a multi-leg payout.

According to the memo obtained by ESPN, partner operators were told not to offer parlays combining unders on multiple statistics for the same player, bets on who wins the opening tip, or markets on whether a player will miss a specified shot. The memo also covered under bets on players expected to play fewer than 12 minutes in a game, and alternate under lines with larger payouts.
The NBA connected the same-player under parlays to the recent federal cases involving former Toronto Raptors player Jontay Porter and former Charlotte Hornets guard Terry Rozier. Porter pleaded guilty to a scheme in which he left games early; prosecutors have alleged a similar betting pattern involving Rozier, who has denied wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty. Those legal distinctions matter: the Porter facts are admitted in court, while the Rozier allegations remain allegations.
A single-player under parlay can combine points, rebounds, assists and other statistics into one high-payout wager. If a player’s court time changes suddenly, several legs can move together. The NBA described these as low-likelihood, high-payout bets and said the Porter and Rozier cases were among the factors in its review.
The league also weighed how strict limits might affect the legal market. ESPN quoted NBA executive Scott Kaufman-Ross saying the league wanted to remove problematic bet types without simply pushing activity toward illegal operators. The NBA says its sportsbook partners account for more than 99% of the U.S. betting market, which gives its agreements reach but does not make every betting product or operator identical.
For readers trying to understand what a posted market actually promises, TopGamb’s guide to sportsbook settlement rules for player props covers a separate but related question: what happens after a bet is accepted.
A removed market is not a reason to rush into a replacement bet. Check the operator’s current rules, confirm the player’s status and expected role through reliable team news, and read the market terms before staking anything. Rules can differ by jurisdiction and sportsbook, and a line that remains available is not evidence that it offers good value.
These restrictions also do not eliminate gambling risk or guarantee that a game is free from integrity problems. Keep sports betting inside a fixed entertainment budget. A limit should not rise because a market has changed or a previous wager lost. If betting starts to feel difficult to stop, pause and use local support; the National Council on Problem Gambling lists confidential help options in the United States.
The practical signal is that leagues and operators can reshape the menu when a bet type creates concentrated risk. Readers should treat each market as a set of written rules, not as a prediction about a player’s intent or a shortcut to a reliable return.
Related TopGamb coverage: checking state rules before a mobile sports bet, basketball betting basics and setting sportsbook account controls.